Cyclic Voltammetry Simulator

Cyclic Voltammetry Simulator

Cyclic Voltammetry Simulator - Basics of Cyclic Voltammetry

Theoretical • Semi-infinite planar diffusion • Nicholson–Shain convolution • Butler–Volmer kinetics • IUPAC sign convention

Dr. M Kanagasabapathy
Associate Professor of Chemistry
Rajapalayam Rajus' College
Madurai Kamaraj University
Rajapalayam, (TN) 626117, India
CV Simulation
Scan Rate Overlay
Randles–Ševčík (ip vs √ν)
Concentration Plot (ip vs C)
Theory & Equations
Input Parameters
Centre of CV  |  Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ ≈ 0.77 V  |  Ferrocene ≈ 0.40 V
1 mM = 0.001  |  10 mM = 0.01  |  ip ∝ C (linear)
Integer 1–8  |  ΔEp = 59.16/n mV at 298 K
0.5 = symmetric barrier  |  affects peak asymmetry
Scan covers E°' ± this value. Min 0.15 V recommended.
T = 298 K (25°C) A = 1 cm² F/RT = 38.924 V⁻¹ 59.16 mV thermal DO = DR (ideal) Estart = E°'+window (auto) Eswitch = E°'−window (auto) IUPAC: cathodic i < 0
Sign Convention (IUPAC): Reduction O + ne⁻ → R = cathodic = negative current. Oxidation R → O + ne⁻ = anodic = positive current. Some older textbooks (American convention) show cathodic peaks pointing upward — the opposite.
Multi Scan Rate Overlay

Runs 6 scan rates simultaneously using all parameters from Tab 1. Peak current ip grows as √ν. Shapes remain identical for a reversible system — only amplitude changes.

Randles–Ševčík Diagnostic: ip vs √ν

For diffusion-controlled systems, |ipc| and ipa are linearly proportional to √ν. A straight line through the origin is consistent with diffusion control under this ideal model. The slope gives D if n, A, C are known.

Concentration Diagnostic: ip vs C

Randles–Ševčík predicts ip is linearly proportional to C (concentration). This is consistent with an ideal diffusion-controlled system and is the basis of analytical calibration curves in electrochemistry.

Core Equations
Redox reaction: O + n e⁻ ⇌ R Nernst equation (equilibrium surface condition): E = E°' + (RT/nF)·ln(C_O/C_R) = E°' + (0.02569/n)·ln(C_O/C_R) Overpotential: η = E − E°' (negative η drives reduction; positive η drives oxidation) Butler–Volmer kinetics — IUPAC sign (anodic = positive i): i = nFA·[ k°·C_R(0,t)·exp((1−α)nFη/RT) − k°·C_O(0,t)·exp(−αnFη/RT) ] where kf = k°·exp(−αnFη/RT) [reduction], kb = k°·exp((1−α)nFη/RT) [oxidation] Jreduction = kf·C_O − kb·C_R (reduction flux, +ve cathodic) i (IUPAC) = −nFA·Jreduction = nFA·[kb·C_R − kf·C_O] Randles–Ševčík peak current — REVERSIBLE, 298 K: ip = 0.4463·n·F·A·C·√(nFDν/RT) ip (A) = 2.687×10⁵ · n^(3/2) · D^(1/2) · C (mol/cm³) · ν^(1/2) · A (cm²) Randles–Ševčík peak current — IRREVERSIBLE, 298 K: ip = 0.4958·n·F·A·C·√(αnFDν/RT) ip (A) = 2.990×10⁵ · (αn)^(1/2) · n · D^(1/2) · C (mol/cm³) · ν^(1/2) · A (cm²) Peak separation — reversible, 298 K: ΔEp = |Epa − Epc| = 59.16/n mV (independent of ν, D, C) Nicholson reversibility parameter ψ: ψ = k° / √(D·nFν/RT) [ψ > 7: reversible | 0.001–7: quasi | < 0.001: irreversible] Irreversible cathodic peak potential (shifts with ν): Epc = E°' − (RT/αnF)·[ 0.780 + 0.5·ln(αnFDν/RT) − ln(k°) ] Epc shifts −(30/αn) mV per decade of ν (Tafel-like shift, Bard & Faulkner eq 6.2.32) Diffusion layer thickness (grows during scan): δ (cm) ≈ √(πDt) → δ (μm) ≈ 10⁴·√(πDt) Example: D=10⁻⁵ cm²/s, ν=10 mV/s, window=350 mV → t=35 s → δ ≈ 332 μm Cottrell equation (current after potential step / after peak): i(t) = nFAC·√(D/πt) → i ∝ t^(−½) Half-wave potential: E½ = (Epa + Epc)/2 ≈ E°' (exact for reversible; approximate for quasi-rev)

What is cyclic voltammetry?

The working electrode potential is linearly swept from Estart → Eswitch (forward sweep) then back to Estart (reverse sweep), while current is recorded. The resulting i–E curve — the cyclic voltammogram — encodes thermodynamics (E°'), kinetics (k°, α), and transport (D, C).

Why does a peak appear?

As E passes E°', O reduces rapidly → current surges. But O near the electrode depletes faster than diffusion replenishes it. The diffusion layer grows as √(Dt) — supply falls — current drops after the peak. This competition between electrochemical reaction and mass transport creates the characteristic peak shape.

Cathodic sweep (forward)

  • E sweeps from +window → −window (more reducing)
  • At E ≈ E°': O + ne⁻ → R begins
  • IUPAC: cathodic current = negative; peaks at Epc
  • Post-peak: diffusion limitation → Cottrell decay
  • R builds up near electrode surface

Anodic sweep (return)

  • E sweeps back toward +window
  • R near electrode is re-oxidized: R → O + ne⁻
  • Anodic (positive) current peak at Epa
  • For reversible: |ipa| = |ipc| → |ipa/ipc| = 1 (note: with IUPAC sign, ipc < 0 and ipa > 0)
  • Two peaks together form the "duck" or "butterfly" shape

Reversibility — what ψ means

  • Reversible (ψ > 7): k° ≫ mass transport rate. Nernst equation obeyed at all times. ΔEp = 59.16/n mV. |ipa/ipc| = 1. ip ∝ √ν.
  • Quasi-rev (0.001 < ψ < 7): Both peaks visible. ΔEp > 59/n mV and grows with ν. Peaks broaden.
  • Irreversible (ψ < 0.001): Return peak absent. Epc shifts −30/(αn) mV per decade of ν.

Effect of each parameter

  • C ↑: ip ∝ C — taller peaks, unchanged shape (calibration basis)
  • D ↑: ip ∝ √D — taller peaks
  • ν ↑: ip ∝ √ν — taller peaks; ΔEp unchanged (reversible)
  • n ↑: ip ∝ n^(3/2) (rev); ΔEp = 59.16/n mV narrower
  • k° ↓: ΔEp increases, peaks shift apart, anodic peak shrinks
  • α ≠ 0.5: only affects quasi-rev/irreversible systems — shifts peak position and creates asymmetric peak widths; has NO effect in the fully reversible (Nernstian) limit

Diagnostic checklist (real experiments)

  • ip vs √ν = straight line through origin → consistent with diffusion control (ideal model)
  • ip vs C = straight line through origin → analytical linearity ✓ (ideal model; real CVs may show offset due to background current or adsorption)
  • ΔEp = 59.16/n mV (independent of ν) → reversible ✓
  • |ipa/ipc| = 1 → stable product R ✓
  • E½ = E°' (independent of ν) → thermodynamic stability ✓
  • ΔEp increases with ν → quasi-reversible kinetics
  • No return peak → irreversible or coupled chemical reaction

Model assumptions & limitations

  • Semi-infinite planar diffusion (no convection, no stirring)
  • DO = DR (equal diffusion coefficients)
  • Electrode is macroscopic: radius ≫ diffusion layer √(Dt)
  • No double-layer charging current (purely Faradaic)
  • No adsorption, no coupled chemical reactions (EC, CE, etc.)
  • Bulk concentration C* uniform and constant far from electrode
Numerical method: Nicholson–Shain convolution integral with 1 mV potential steps. Reversible case: Nernst equation enforced directly at each step (exact, no Butler-Volmer needed). Quasi/irreversible: Butler–Volmer solved implicitly (single linear equation per step — numerically stable for the parameter ranges applicable to this model). Convolution kernel: g[m] = √(Δt)·(√m − √(m−1)), which is the exact semi-infinite diffusion Green's function.

Refer: Cyclic Voltammetry Basics



 

Book on Simulated Cyclic Voltammograms: Basics of Electrochemical Kinetics