Cyclic Voltammetry Simulator
Cyclic Voltammetry Simulator - Basics of Cyclic Voltammetry
Theoretical • Semi-infinite planar diffusion • Nicholson–Shain convolution • Butler–Volmer kinetics • IUPAC sign convention
Associate Professor of Chemistry
Rajapalayam Rajus' College
Madurai Kamaraj University
Rajapalayam, (TN) 626117, India
Runs 6 scan rates simultaneously using all parameters from Tab 1. Peak current ip grows as √ν. Shapes remain identical for a reversible system — only amplitude changes.
For diffusion-controlled systems, |ipc| and ipa are linearly proportional to √ν. A straight line through the origin is consistent with diffusion control under this ideal model. The slope gives D if n, A, C are known.
Randles–Ševčík predicts ip is linearly proportional to C (concentration). This is consistent with an ideal diffusion-controlled system and is the basis of analytical calibration curves in electrochemistry.
O + n e⁻ ⇌ R
Nernst equation (equilibrium surface condition):
E = E°' + (RT/nF)·ln(C_O/C_R) = E°' + (0.02569/n)·ln(C_O/C_R)
Overpotential:
η = E − E°' (negative η drives reduction; positive η drives oxidation)
Butler–Volmer kinetics — IUPAC sign (anodic = positive i):
i = nFA·[ k°·C_R(0,t)·exp((1−α)nFη/RT) − k°·C_O(0,t)·exp(−αnFη/RT) ]
where kf = k°·exp(−αnFη/RT) [reduction], kb = k°·exp((1−α)nFη/RT) [oxidation]
Jreduction = kf·C_O − kb·C_R (reduction flux, +ve cathodic)
i (IUPAC) = −nFA·Jreduction = nFA·[kb·C_R − kf·C_O]
Randles–Ševčík peak current — REVERSIBLE, 298 K:
ip = 0.4463·n·F·A·C·√(nFDν/RT)
ip (A) = 2.687×10⁵ · n^(3/2) · D^(1/2) · C (mol/cm³) · ν^(1/2) · A (cm²)
Randles–Ševčík peak current — IRREVERSIBLE, 298 K:
ip = 0.4958·n·F·A·C·√(αnFDν/RT)
ip (A) = 2.990×10⁵ · (αn)^(1/2) · n · D^(1/2) · C (mol/cm³) · ν^(1/2) · A (cm²)
Peak separation — reversible, 298 K:
ΔEp = |Epa − Epc| = 59.16/n mV (independent of ν, D, C)
Nicholson reversibility parameter ψ:
ψ = k° / √(D·nFν/RT) [ψ > 7: reversible | 0.001–7: quasi | < 0.001: irreversible]
Irreversible cathodic peak potential (shifts with ν):
Epc = E°' − (RT/αnF)·[ 0.780 + 0.5·ln(αnFDν/RT) − ln(k°) ]
Epc shifts −(30/αn) mV per decade of ν (Tafel-like shift, Bard & Faulkner eq 6.2.32)
Diffusion layer thickness (grows during scan):
δ (cm) ≈ √(πDt) → δ (μm) ≈ 10⁴·√(πDt)
Example: D=10⁻⁵ cm²/s, ν=10 mV/s, window=350 mV → t=35 s → δ ≈ 332 μm
Cottrell equation (current after potential step / after peak):
i(t) = nFAC·√(D/πt) → i ∝ t^(−½)
Half-wave potential:
E½ = (Epa + Epc)/2 ≈ E°' (exact for reversible; approximate for quasi-rev)
What is cyclic voltammetry?
The working electrode potential is linearly swept from Estart → Eswitch (forward sweep) then back to Estart (reverse sweep), while current is recorded. The resulting i–E curve — the cyclic voltammogram — encodes thermodynamics (E°'), kinetics (k°, α), and transport (D, C).
Why does a peak appear?
As E passes E°', O reduces rapidly → current surges. But O near the electrode depletes faster than diffusion replenishes it. The diffusion layer grows as √(Dt) — supply falls — current drops after the peak. This competition between electrochemical reaction and mass transport creates the characteristic peak shape.
Cathodic sweep (forward)
- E sweeps from +window → −window (more reducing)
- At E ≈ E°': O + ne⁻ → R begins
- IUPAC: cathodic current = negative; peaks at Epc
- Post-peak: diffusion limitation → Cottrell decay
- R builds up near electrode surface
Anodic sweep (return)
- E sweeps back toward +window
- R near electrode is re-oxidized: R → O + ne⁻
- Anodic (positive) current peak at Epa
- For reversible: |ipa| = |ipc| → |ipa/ipc| = 1 (note: with IUPAC sign, ipc < 0 and ipa > 0)
- Two peaks together form the "duck" or "butterfly" shape
Reversibility — what ψ means
- Reversible (ψ > 7): k° ≫ mass transport rate. Nernst equation obeyed at all times. ΔEp = 59.16/n mV. |ipa/ipc| = 1. ip ∝ √ν.
- Quasi-rev (0.001 < ψ < 7): Both peaks visible. ΔEp > 59/n mV and grows with ν. Peaks broaden.
- Irreversible (ψ < 0.001): Return peak absent. Epc shifts −30/(αn) mV per decade of ν.
Effect of each parameter
- C ↑: ip ∝ C — taller peaks, unchanged shape (calibration basis)
- D ↑: ip ∝ √D — taller peaks
- ν ↑: ip ∝ √ν — taller peaks; ΔEp unchanged (reversible)
- n ↑: ip ∝ n^(3/2) (rev); ΔEp = 59.16/n mV narrower
- k° ↓: ΔEp increases, peaks shift apart, anodic peak shrinks
- α ≠ 0.5: only affects quasi-rev/irreversible systems — shifts peak position and creates asymmetric peak widths; has NO effect in the fully reversible (Nernstian) limit
Diagnostic checklist (real experiments)
- ip vs √ν = straight line through origin → consistent with diffusion control (ideal model)
- ip vs C = straight line through origin → analytical linearity ✓ (ideal model; real CVs may show offset due to background current or adsorption)
- ΔEp = 59.16/n mV (independent of ν) → reversible ✓
- |ipa/ipc| = 1 → stable product R ✓
- E½ = E°' (independent of ν) → thermodynamic stability ✓
- ΔEp increases with ν → quasi-reversible kinetics
- No return peak → irreversible or coupled chemical reaction
Model assumptions & limitations
- Semi-infinite planar diffusion (no convection, no stirring)
- DO = DR (equal diffusion coefficients)
- Electrode is macroscopic: radius ≫ diffusion layer √(Dt)
- No double-layer charging current (purely Faradaic)
- No adsorption, no coupled chemical reactions (EC, CE, etc.)
- Bulk concentration C* uniform and constant far from electrode
Refer: Cyclic Voltammetry Basics
Book on Simulated Cyclic Voltammograms: Basics of Electrochemical Kinetics

